Intuition Improvement Proposal (IIP) Template

How to Submit an IIP

  1. Create a new topic under Governance → IIPs.

  2. Use the title format: IIP-[Category]-[Number]: [Short Title]

  3. Copy and fill in the Universal IIP Template below.

  4. Discuss openly — revisions are encouraged.

  5. Once reviewed and voted on, the IIP will be tagged as Accepted, Rejected, or Implemented.

Universal IIP Template

:label: Proposal Overview

IIP Number: (Assigned by moderators — e.g. IIP-Core-02)

Title: Concise name for the proposal

Author(s): @username or team name

Category: Core / Eco / Gov / Agent / Semantics / Comm

Status: Draft / Review / Accepted / Implemented

Created: YYYY-MM-DD


1. Summary

A one-paragraph overview of what this proposal is and why it matters.

Example:

This proposal introduces a standardized bonding-curve formula for all Intuition data markets to ensure predictable pricing and better alignment between liquidity providers and data contributors.


2. Motivation

Why this proposal exists. What problem or inefficiency does it solve?

Example:

Current bonding curves differ across subnets, leading to fragmented pricing and inconsistent returns. A unified model simplifies integration and improves network coherence.


3. Proposal / Specification

Describe the change in detail. Include parameters, logic, or implementation steps depending on category.

Example:

  • Formula: Price = a * Supply^2 + b

  • Applies to: all bonding markets post-Epoch 2

  • On-chain enforcement through Subnet upgrade v1.3.0


4. Impact

Explain how this affects users, builders, validators, agents, or the broader ecosystem.

Example:

This standard reduces complexity for builders, ensures fairer pricing for contributors, and stabilizes token velocity across InfoFi markets.


5. Implementation Plan

Step-by-step outline with responsible parties and estimated timing.

Example:

  1. Draft specification published (Week 1)

  2. Community review and feedback (Weeks 2-3)

  3. On-chain parameter update (Week 4)

  4. Audit and rollout confirmation (Week 5)


6. Rationale

Explain why this approach was chosen over alternatives and how it aligns with Intuition’s mission.

Example:

The quadratic curve better models information scarcity and rewards early discovery — aligning with Intuition’s goal of decentralizing the economics of knowledge.

7. Risks & Considerations

Potential downsides, attack surfaces, or unintended outcomes.

Example:

  • Liquidity may initially tighten as LPs rebalance.

  • Requires coordination with existing subnets to migrate parameters.


8. Dependencies / Related Work

Link to other IIPs, GitHub repos, or external specs.

Example:

  • Depends on IIP-Core-01 (Subnet Upgrade Framework)

  • Related to IIP-Eco-04 (Liquidity Incentive Schedule)


9. Success Criteria

Define how success will be measured once implemented.

Example:

  • 90% of data markets migrate to the unified curve

  • 20% reduction in price volatility over a 30-day period


10. References

Any external sources, research, or documentation.

Example:


:white_check_mark: Example Final Line

This IIP aligns with Intuition’s vision of creating a universal, verifiable layer of trust and meaning across the decentralized web.

1 Like