Intuition Box - DAO launch

Intuition Box is creating an ecosystem of Intuition builders. At the intersection of the Intuition launch and the evolving of AI, we now have the opportunity to democratize and offer builders an aspiring opportunity to shape the future of the world by leveraging the Intuition Protocol.

Intuition Box is under services contract by the Intuition Foundation with the mission to speed up the uptake and expansion of the Intuition ecosystem. We will assist builders who carry out actions that live up to expectations and align our mission and values by:

  • Exploration of Intuition use cases
    • Decentralized governance
    • Community building
  • Documenting and public building
  • Mentoring builders
  • Recognizing and rewarding public good contributions

Intuition Box is for all Intuition builders — contributors, researchers, developers, designers, operators, and anyone shipping meaningful work in or around Intuition.


Intuition Box DAO

The eventual achievement of our shared objective of creating a better, more harmonious Intuition ecosystem will be heavily influenced by our collective actions and how we choose to prioritize from this community seed. The Intuition Box DAO is composed of all Intuition builders, it has its own Treasury and is in charge of deploying these funds on behalf of the community to projects and individuals developing valuable services and products on top of Intuition.

The DAO membership is seeded with every builder who has contributed to Intuition. The DAO will be accountable for the developer community and how it allocates funds, and will offer quarterly updates on how funds have been used.

Intuition Box LLC and Intuition Foundation signed an agreement to provide monthly USD $10,000 to the DAO, those funds will be in the Intuition mainnet, allocated in a Safe detailed bellow. This structure is designed to evolve as Intuition Box matures and progresses to a fully decentralized structure, which all members will own based on merit.

We need to keep things safe, compliant, and operationally simple while we bootstrap, we’re using this initial structure:

  • Intuition Foundation: provides the monthly funding commitment
  • Intuition Box (Delaware LLC): operation entity that can sign contracts and pay bills (vendors, services, etc.)
  • Intuition Box Safe (Ethereum → Arbitrum): a passthrough flow to fund on-chain operations and incentives
  • Intuition Box DAO (Colony contract): governance control and reputation issuer

What DAO governance controls (initially):

  • Allocation between ops / incentives (within the monthly budget)
  • Payments, rewards and bounty approvals
  • Public reporting expectations and process

What DAO governance does not control (initially):

  • Foundation-level decisions outside Intuition Box
  • Legal responsibilities of the Ops Entity
  • Anything that would create legal or compliance risk without proper guardrails

DAO Mainnet Safe

This multisig Ethereum Safe will use Gnosis Safe smart contracts and serve as a secure passthrough flow from the Intuition Foundation to our operations treasury in Arbitrum using Colony.io smart contracts. In the initial setup, the funds will be split as:

  • $6k for core members:
    • $3k for full time commitment (Saulo)
    • $3k for full time commitment (Zet)
  • $4k for builders’ missions, bounties, grants, or retroactive rewards

DAO Framework

Everyone will have the same opportunity to have influence in the DAO over time. We propose Colony as the DAO framework for these advantages:

  • Fair ownership distribution
    • Spread of influence where inactive members fade away and active members gain ownership
    • Natural participation decay
    • Based on merit
  • Zero participation overhead
    • Lazy consensus (only requires votes for opposing)
    • Zero transaction fees (sponsored by Colony)
  • Structure and transparency
    • Auto-accountability via domain grouping
    • Transactions labeling
  • Permissions flexibility
    • Embraces progressive decentralization
      • Administrators are a backup (can be removed via community consensus)
      • Domains admins
    • Reputation based

DAO Reputation

The DAO will use its own iBOX token as a reputation unit to coordinate incentives and participation, it is the primitive for governance voting weight and participation decay (Colony Reputation).

Important notes:

  • iBOX is intended as a participation and governance mechanism, not equity and not an investment product
  • iBOX is not a promise of profit and should not be treated as such
  • Any “backing” language refers to treasury policy targets and transparency, the redemption right inherits TRUST’s value and doesn’t have a value by itself

Treasury policy target (initial intention):

  • iBOX is a native token issued in Colony
  • Transferability is locked until decentralized consensus about its release is achieved
  • Honored 1:1 with TRUST and participation
  • Intuition Box will only emit iBOX tokens corresponding to its TRUST treasury

DAO Membership

The DAO membership encompasses all Intuition builders. Members receive monthly governance participation rewards to offset voting-right decay. The initial iBOX allocation is based on each member’s percentage of market-cap shares in the DAO’s Intuition list “Intuition Box Members.”

Intuition Box members conditions:

  • A claim exists: memberXYZ - is member of - Intuition.box
  • Only builders with proof of work are eligible voters (only their votes are counted)
  • Self-votes are not counted
  • Voting is equal-weight: each eligible member has the same voting weight (stake amount is abstracted away / does not affect voting power)

Subsequent iBOX distribution is attributed to:

  • Contributors’ payments and rewards (each contributor chooses their own split between USDC and iBOX)
    • to public goods
    • to Intuition Box
  • Governance participants
    • Initially 1 iBOX per week
    • Sentiment signaling
    • Decision-making and direction

Conclusion

We’re kicking this off with a forum thread and a Colony/DAO workshop. If you’re building in the ecosystem, we want you here!

We are looking forward for your participation—please leave your comments, suggestions, or questions and we will direct them the best way possible.

Lastly, look forward for an upcoming workshop that will happen on our Discord with the Colony team, to showcase the Colony app (date will be announced later).

7 Likes

Just the beginning! :eye:

Quite excited for this.

5 Likes

Lfg, this is super exciting.

4 Likes

Let’s Have It​:fire::fire:

4 Likes

amazing a new ear is upon us

4 Likes

I look forward to it

3 Likes

Looks great to me !

2 Likes

Super excited

2 Likes

Glad to be here on time, happy to contribute!

3,3

2 Likes

The bright mind(s) behind the creation of a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) on Intuition must be a genius. I love it when I see platforms like the Intuition Box that are there helping early builders scale, while helping genuine projects get some start-up funding they need to scale up their project in turning that idea into a reality.

About the workshop, I will definitely be there for SURE!!!

Thank you Zet and Saulo for giving us Intuition Box.

3 Likes

exciting times ahead !

3 Likes

Hello, I’m very happy to see this project taking concrete shape and to have the opportunity to contribute to it. However, I would like to get some clarifications on a few points:

• Regarding the DAO Mainnet Safe section:

  • You mention “$4k for builders’ missions, bounties, grants, or retroactive rewards.”
    When you say “for all builders,” what exactly do you mean by “all builders,” and according to what selection criteria will they be rewarded? Will the rewards be distributed fairly, based on the work they’ve accomplished?
    At first glance, $4k seems like a relatively limited amount for the current number of builders.

    Can we define a scale based on the type of contribution (development, security, documentation, audits), the level of impact, and the duration of involvement?

    How do you assign importance to one project over another when their goals differ?
    Are there universal prioritization criteria (such as network impact, security, compliance, or adoption) that you apply?

• Regarding the DAO Framework section:

  • You mention “Based on merit.”
    Could you clarify what you mean by “merit” and what concrete criteria will be used to assess its quality?

    For instance, will it be based on code quality, measurable impact, documented contributions, peer review, verifiable results, or security aspects?

  • “Lazy consensus (only requires votes for opposing)” — how do you plan to avoid favoritism or closed-group dynamics, and ensure that decisions genuinely reflect merit and the collective interest?

    If I understand correctly, the weight of a vote may vary depending on merit. However, someone who works very hard on the project and dedicates most of their time to actual contributions might spend less time socializing or promoting themselves on social media.
    In this case, I don’t see much of a truly contributive voting aspect, but rather an arbitrary one — which seems somewhat contradictory for a DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization), which is supposed to be impartial.

    Will there be transparent mechanisms, moderator rotation, public audits, and weighting based on measurable contribution rather than social visibility?

  • “Reputation based” — how will this reputation be measured?
    Will it depend on the amount of work, the quality of the projects, the number of positive votes, seniority, or other indicators?
    Could you please specify the metrics used and their weighting?

Thank you in advance for your clarifications, and I’m happy to be part of the adventure — keep it up!!

2 Likes

looks good

1 Like