# \#metamask-snap

**URL:** https://atlas.discourse.group/tag/metamask-snap/11.md

[Latest](https://atlas.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://atlas.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://atlas.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Claims about crypto addresses, which ones are the most important?](https://atlas.discourse.group/t/claims-about-crypto-addresses-which-ones-are-the-most-important/1264)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@smilingkylan](https://atlas.discourse.group/u/smilingkylan)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [June 9, 2026, 11:26pm UTC](https://atlas.discourse.group/t/claims-about-crypto-addresses-which-ones-are-the-most-important/1264 "2026-06-09T23:26:40Z")

</div>

Now that I’ve wrapped my head around trust circles, our browser extension is starting to support EVM addresses, and I’ve thought about how I expect them to function I want to be able to apply this vision to the MetaMask …